<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 232 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34824</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the decision regarding penalty enhancement under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found no reasonable cause for waiving the penalty under Section 80. In another aspect, the penalty for delay in service tax payment cannot exceed the actual tax amount as per Section 76. The Revisional Authority&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to match the service tax liability was upheld by the High Court, affirming that penalties should not surpass the unpaid service tax amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 232 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34824</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld the decision regarding penalty enhancement under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found no reasonable cause for waiving the penalty under Section 80. In another aspect, the penalty for delay in service tax payment cannot exceed the actual tax amount as per Section 76. The Revisional Authority&#039;s decision to reduce the penalty to match the service tax liability was upheld by the High Court, affirming that penalties should not surpass the unpaid service tax amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>