2009 (9) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the respondent. [Order per: Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Technical Member] - Heard both sides. Shri V.S. Manoj, Ld. Advocate, appearing for the appellants states that the demand of service tax for the period April-03 to March-06 is time barred as the information was available with the department subsequent to the departmental audit of the appellant's records.  He further states that the tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ancial Services Ltd. Vs. CST, Chennai, - Stay Order No. 328/09 dated 30.04.09. 3. We find that the period in dispute is from 10.09.04 to 30.09.07.  The appellants had not furnished the details of pre-closure charges to the department till audit by the departmental officers and further correspondence with the appellants.  Hence, prima facie we are of the view that the department is justi....