<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 48 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34711</link>
    <description>In a prima facie assessment of waiver of pre-deposit, CESTAT Chennai found the service tax demand not time-barred at this stage because the dispute spanned several years and the details of pre-closure charges were furnished to the department only during audit and later correspondence. It also held that the pre-closure charges could not, on the available record, be treated as prima facie equivalent to interest for classification under banking and other financial services. Applying a similar approach taken in a comparable matter, the tribunal directed partial pre-deposit, granted waiver of the balance, and stayed recovery during the appeal subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 09:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 48 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34711</link>
      <description>In a prima facie assessment of waiver of pre-deposit, CESTAT Chennai found the service tax demand not time-barred at this stage because the dispute spanned several years and the details of pre-closure charges were furnished to the department only during audit and later correspondence. It also held that the pre-closure charges could not, on the available record, be treated as prima facie equivalent to interest for classification under banking and other financial services. Applying a similar approach taken in a comparable matter, the tribunal directed partial pre-deposit, granted waiver of the balance, and stayed recovery during the appeal subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>