2009 (7) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dhyay, Advs., for the Appellant. Sh. Fateh Singh, Authorised Departmental Representative (DR) for the Respondent. [Order per D. N. Panda Judicial Member]. - Ld. Counsel Shri J. K. Mittal has a very limited dispute in this case. When the appellant made an application to the jurisdictional authorities on 15.11.06 stating that the appellant is not liable to pay service tax under the category of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e further held that there was no provocation for making the appeal before him when Supdt. had not taken a final decision on the appellant's application dt.15.11.06. 2. Ld. DR submits that there is no quantification of the demand. 3. Heard both sides and perused the record. When we look into para 5 of the order passed by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) with aforesaid observations by him, we ar....