<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 40 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34249</link>
    <description>Outcome: The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Ld. Commissioner for a fresh hearing, directing a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case and receive a reasoned order based on relevant legal provisions. The decision aimed to rectify procedural irregularities and uphold principles of natural justice and due process in resolving the dispute regarding liability for service tax and cancellation of registration in the category of advertising services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 40 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34249</link>
      <description>Outcome: The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Ld. Commissioner for a fresh hearing, directing a fair opportunity for the appellant to present their case and receive a reasoned order based on relevant legal provisions. The decision aimed to rectify procedural irregularities and uphold principles of natural justice and due process in resolving the dispute regarding liability for service tax and cancellation of registration in the category of advertising services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>