2014 (2) TMI 1426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....V.S Shroti, Senior counsel with Shri Ashish Shroti, counsel for the respondent ORDER Per Rajendra Menon, J: This application has been filed for review/recall of an order dated 16/05/2006 passed by a Bench of this Court in M.A No. 1153/1999. 2. The dispute arises out of the judgment rendered against the judgment debtor M/s. Pemier Brass & Metal Works Pvt. Ltd, Bhopal who had availed fac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed on 16/05/2006, applicant herein filed an application for intervention, however as he did not appear when the appeal was finally heard as stated in para 10 of the order dated 16/05/2006, the appeal has been decided in favour of the Bank and now this application has been filed merely on the ground that the right of the intervenor was not considered and by contending that the judgment of the Supre....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The second ground is that at the instance of intervenor the review is not maintainable, it is said that that even if in the appeal intervenor had any grievance he could not claim any relief for himself as a intervenor, he may have a right to intervene but as a intervenor has no right to seek any relief to himself in a proceeding, though, the application is not maintainable. Reliance is placed on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri Shroti, Senior counsel. In the appeal that was pending i.e M.A No. 1153/1999, the applicant as a intervenor could not claim any relief for himself based on the right that accrued to him by virtue of the auction conducted in his favour. He could not stake his right to the property by way of intervention, he could only either support or oppose the claim of one of the party. In the capacity of a ....