https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309895 An intervenor in proceedings under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC may support or oppose the existing parties, but has no locus to seek independent substantive relief or an enforceable decree for himself. The Madhya Pradesh High Court applied that principle to hold that a person impleaded only as an intervenor could not pursue review or recall of the appellate order on the basis of an alleged auction-derived property right. As the grievance could not be advanced through intervention alone, the review/recall application was held to serve no useful purpose and was rejected as not maintainable. en-us Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:27:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309895 An intervenor in proceedings under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC may support or oppose the existing parties, but has no locus to seek independent substantive relief or an enforceable decree for himself. The Madhya Pradesh High Court applied that principle to hold that a person impleaded only as an intervenor could not pursue review or recall of the appellate order on the basis of an alleged auction-derived property right. As the grievance could not be advanced through intervention alone, the review/recall application was held to serve no useful purpose and was rejected as not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309895