Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (4) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondents. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by K. RAVIRAJA PANDIAN, J. - The appeals are filed by the revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras A Bench dated 16.7.2003 made in I.T.A.No.1118, 1119/Mds/1996 and 1795 and 1796/Mds/1998 respectively. The relevant assessment years are 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95. The substantial questions....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  The first appellate authority held that the amount received on account of higher free sale of sugar was a revenue receipt includible in the total income of the assessee and confirmed the order of the assessing officer. The addition is confirmed on account of excise duty debited in the profit and loss account which was in fact was not an ascertained liability or a real liability of the excis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ever, the excise duty rebate or excise duty incentive would not form part of income from business assessable to tax under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For coming to the said conclusion the Division Bench relied on the decision of this court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd., reported in 260 ITR 605. 5. In the case of Commissioner of Inc....