<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33606</link>
    <description>The court held that receipts from the sale of levy-free sugar and excise duty rebate were capital receipts and not taxable. Relying on legal precedents, including a Supreme Court decision, the court determined that the incentives were intended for loan repayment and were of a capital nature, not part of regular trade income. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 86 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33606</link>
      <description>The court held that receipts from the sale of levy-free sugar and excise duty rebate were capital receipts and not taxable. Relying on legal precedents, including a Supreme Court decision, the court determined that the incentives were intended for loan repayment and were of a capital nature, not part of regular trade income. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>