2023 (3) TMI 163
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Respondent : A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. ORDER HON'BLE VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 24.6.2022, whereby registration of the petitioner is cancelled and the order dated 26.11.2022, whereby the Appeal No.D-94 of 2022, U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....stration of the petitioner was cancelled. Against the said order, the petitioner filed an appeal which was dismissed by the appellate authority on the ground of delay. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since he has not been heard while passing the order dated 24.6.2022, as such the present petitioner is also entitled for the benefit of the order passed by this Court in Writ Tax No....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ground that the same is non speaking order. This Court while deciding Writ Tax No.147 of 2022 (M/S Chandrasen, Sarda Nagar, Lucknow vs Union of India and others) had held that the order of cancellation of registration or any other order passed either on administrative or on judicial side is without any reason and prima facie, without application of mind, the same does not stand the test of scruti....
TaxTMI