GST Registration Cancellation Overturned: Procedural Errors Found, Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Respond and Seek Fair Hearing

HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to GST registration cancellation. The court found the cancellation order non-speaking and procedurally flawed. The petitioner was directed to submit a reply to the show cause notice, and the respondent was instructed to pass a fresh order after hearing the petitioner, ensuring compliance with principles of natural justice and constitutional fairness.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to cancellation of GST registration based on non-filing of GST return, Appeal dismissal on grounds of delay, Right to be heard before cancellation, Application of judicial precedents on non-speaking orders.

Analysis:
The judgment by Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J., of the Allahabad High Court addresses the challenge to the cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of GST return. The petitioner, a sole proprietary of an advertising agency firm, had their registration cancelled after failing to file a reply to a show cause notice issued on 30.5.2022. The petitioner's appeal against the cancellation was dismissed on grounds of delay.

The petitioner argued that not being heard before the cancellation violated their rights. Citing a previous judgment in Technosum India Pvt. Ltd. Lucknow Vs. Union of India, the petitioner contended that cancellation solely for failing to reply to a show cause notice is unjustified. The Court in Technosum India Pvt. Ltd. Lucknow case held that orders lacking reasons and not applying the mind do not meet the scrutiny under Article 14 of the Constitution. The petitioner sought similar relief based on this precedent.

The Court agreed with the petitioner, granting relief and setting aside the order of cancellation and the dismissal of the appeal. The petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent with the reply to the show cause notice and certified copies of the judgment within three weeks. The respondent was instructed to pass a fresh order in accordance with the law upon the petitioner's compliance.

In conclusion, the judgment emphasizes the importance of providing reasons for administrative decisions, especially in cases of cancellation of registrations. It upholds the right of the petitioner to be heard and relies on judicial precedents to ensure fair treatment and due process in such matters.

---