TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Judicial Review Upholds Taxpayer Rights: CGST Registration Cancellation Order Overturned for Lack of Proper Procedural Fairness</h1> <h3>Technosun India Pvt. Ltd. Lucknow Thru. Its Director Amit Kumar Gautam Versus Union of India Thru. Prin. Commissioner, Central G.S.T., Lko. U.P. And 2 Others</h3> Technosun India Pvt. Ltd. Lucknow Thru. Its Director Amit Kumar Gautam Versus Union of India Thru. Prin. Commissioner, Central G.S.T., Lko. U.P. And 2 ... Issues:1. Amendment application seeking quashing of cancellation order.2. Challenge to cancellation of registration under Section 29 of the CGST Act.3. Appeal dismissal on the ground of limitation.4. Judicial review of non-speaking order.5. Application of the doctrine of merger.6. Application of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.Analysis:1. The judgment primarily dealt with an amendment application seeking to quash a cancellation order. The petitioner, engaged in the business of solar equipment, had its registration cancelled due to failure to furnish returns. An additional prayer in the amendment application sought to challenge the cancellation order dated 03.01.2022. The court allowed the amendment application, enabling necessary changes in the writ petition.2. The main petition challenged the cancellation order under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the subsequent dismissal of the appeal. The petitioner's failure to respond to a show cause notice due to a family tragedy led to the cancellation. The court noted the importance of the petitioner's circumstances and the need for a fair review process.3. The appeal dismissal based on limitation was contested by the petitioner's counsel, arguing that the doctrine of merger should not apply. Citing a previous judgment, the counsel highlighted the necessity of a speaking order and the application of judicial scrutiny under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The court, following precedent, emphasized the requirement for reasoned decisions in administrative and judicial orders.4. Considering the principles established in previous cases, the court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the cancellation order. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to present a reply to the show cause notice within a specified timeframe. The judgment underscored the importance of due process and fair consideration in matters of registration cancellation.5. The judgment's significance lies in upholding the principles of natural justice and judicial review in administrative decisions. By allowing the writ petition and directing a fresh review of the cancellation order, the court reaffirmed the importance of reasoned and lawful administrative actions. The application of Article 14 of the Constitution of India was pivotal in ensuring fairness and transparency in the decision-making process.
TaxTMI 