2022 (10) TMI 782
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bhav Gaggar, Ms Sumedha Dang, Mr Prerak Khurana and Mr Mrityunjay Mahendra, Advs. Respondents Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Anish Raj and Mr Dhruv, Advs. for R-2. [Physical Court hearing/ Hybrid hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): 1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner, which is a registered society, challenging Notification No.29/2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....unt the circumstances of smaller body corporates, which are closely held entities. 3. Mr Satish Kumar, who appears on behalf of respondent no.2, on the other hand, says that the instant writ petition, filed at the behest of the petitioner-society, cannot be maintained. 3.1. Apart from this, it is also Mr Kumar's contention that the notification represents a policy decision, taken by the resp....


TaxTMI