<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 782 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429224</link>
    <description>HC upheld the government&#039;s notification amendment regarding security services tax mechanism. The court directed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to be treated as a representation for administrative review. Respondents were instructed to examine the grievance and take appropriate action, effectively deferring the legal challenge to administrative channels without making a definitive ruling on the taxation policy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 782 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429224</link>
      <description>HC upheld the government&#039;s notification amendment regarding security services tax mechanism. The court directed the petitioner&#039;s challenge to be treated as a representation for administrative review. Respondents were instructed to examine the grievance and take appropriate action, effectively deferring the legal challenge to administrative channels without making a definitive ruling on the taxation policy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>