2021 (1) TMI 1263
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....yed Abdul Haseeb, Adv., Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv., Mr. B. V. Balaram Das, AOR For the Respondent : None. ORDER A bail order passed in NDPS matter is sought to be assailed on the ground that the High Court failed to consider the mandatory requirements of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The order of bail was passed on 10.07.2019 and the appeal has been filed after a delay of 405 days. In our view, th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the subsequent judgment in the Office of the Chief Post Master General & Ors. v. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. -(2012) 3 SCC 563 which has dealt with the issue that consideration of the ability of the Government to file appeal in time would have to be dealt with in the context of the technology now available and merely shuffling files from one table to the other would no more be a sufficient rea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....and Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. v. Uday N. Murdukar [SLP [C] Diary No.9228/2020 decided on 15.10.2020]]. We have been imposing costs for wasting judicial time in such matters which are filed with this oblique motive of saving the officers. We thus, consider appropriate to follow the same course of action in the present case and impose costs of Rs.25,000/- on the petitioner to b....