<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1263 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303678</link>
    <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act was applied strictly to a Special Leave Petition filed after a 405-day delay, and the Court found the explanation based on governmental file-shuffling and internal processing to be unsatisfactory. Relying on Office of the Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd., it held that delay caused by administrative lethargy and gross negligence is not a sufficient ground for condonation, and the petition was dismissed as time-barred. To discourage repeated belated filings and misuse of judicial time, the Court also imposed costs of Rs. 25,000, recoverable from the concerned officers and payable to the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Fund, and directed remedial action by the departmental head with warning of consequences for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2022 20:31:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=687124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1263 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303678</link>
      <description>Section 37 of the NDPS Act was applied strictly to a Special Leave Petition filed after a 405-day delay, and the Court found the explanation based on governmental file-shuffling and internal processing to be unsatisfactory. Relying on Office of the Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd., it held that delay caused by administrative lethargy and gross negligence is not a sufficient ground for condonation, and the petition was dismissed as time-barred. To discourage repeated belated filings and misuse of judicial time, the Court also imposed costs of Rs. 25,000, recoverable from the concerned officers and payable to the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Welfare Fund, and directed remedial action by the departmental head with warning of consequences for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>