Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1982 (4) TMI 65

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rm, M/s. Satya Deo Omprakash, was originally constituted under a deed of partnership dated April 2, 1965. One of its partners, namely, Sri Omprakash, died on August 8, 1971. The remaining partners, along with the wife of the deceased partner by a deed dated 12th August, 1971, dissolved the partnership and constituted a new firm with effect from 11th August, 1971. For the assessment year 1972-73, t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessment order and directed the ITO to make two assessments. The order of the AAC was challenged in appeal by the department. This appeal along with the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner passed under s. 263 of the Act were disposed of by the Tribunal by a common order. The Tribunal, following the Full Bench decision of this court in the case of Dahi Laxmi Da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the partners of the firm, M/s. Satya Deo Omprakash, died on 7/8 August, 1971. A deed of dissolution was drawn up, whereunder the old firm was dissolved by mutual consent of the remaining partners. Once the old firm was dissolved by the mutual consent of the surviving partners of the firm and a new partnership came into existence, the case squarely fell under s. 188 of the Act and not under s. 187....