<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29593</link>
    <description>Dissolution of an old firm by mutual consent, followed by constitution of a new partnership from a later date, is treated as succession of one firm by another under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rather than a mere change in constitution under section 187(2). On that footing, separate assessments are justified because the later firm is a distinct successor entity, not the same firm continuing with altered partners. The Tribunal&#039;s view was supported by prior Full Bench and other decisions of the same court, and its order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision under section 263(1) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:16:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29593</link>
      <description>Dissolution of an old firm by mutual consent, followed by constitution of a new partnership from a later date, is treated as succession of one firm by another under section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, rather than a mere change in constitution under section 187(2). On that footing, separate assessments are justified because the later firm is a distinct successor entity, not the same firm continuing with altered partners. The Tribunal&#039;s view was supported by prior Full Bench and other decisions of the same court, and its order setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s revision under section 263(1) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>