2019 (9) TMI 1658
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Judgment of the Court was delivered by N. Kirubakaran, j. Writ Appeal No. 994 of 2019 has been preferred against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.M.P. No. 30822 of 2018 in W.P. No. 3699 of 2017 dated 07.01.2019 by which the appellant's request to modify the earlier order dated 13.06.2017 requiring the appellant to seek permission to travel abroad from the Criminal Courts w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... petition was allowed by order dated 13.06.2017 directing the respondent to renew the appellant's passport for a period of 10 years. On such renewal, the appellant was directed to surrender the said passport before the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, (which on change of jurisdiction, has been assigned to Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai) and in the event of the app....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y this Court in Crl.M.P. No. 11297 of 2004 in Crl.M.P. No. 3521 of 2002 dated 20.12.2004, W.P. No. 24158 of 2006 dated 12.09.2006 and Crl.R.C. No. 287 of 2007 dated 26.02.2007 and would contend that there is no necessity to seek permission from the Court concerned. What is required to be done is only to inform the Court concerned giving the travel details. Therefore, the learned Senior counsel see....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ccasions, he has returned back to India promptly and this is also admitted by the learned counsel for the respondent. When that is the case, there should not be any problem for the appellant to inform the Court concerned, give the travel details and thereafter leave the country. Besides, the appellant is a businessman and there is no chance for him to flee the country as his family is also rooted ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI