https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404 The court allowed the appellant, a reputed businessman facing criminal proceedings, to inform the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate before traveling abroad instead of seeking explicit permission, considering his extensive travel history and strong ties to India. The court emphasized the appellant's past overseas trips with prompt returns and his rooted business and family connections in India, concluding that mere notification to the Magistrate would be sufficient. The decision was based on the appellant's conduct and should not set a precedent for future cases. The writ appeals were disposed of without costs. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404 The court allowed the appellant, a reputed businessman facing criminal proceedings, to inform the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate before traveling abroad instead of seeking explicit permission, considering his extensive travel history and strong ties to India. The court emphasized the appellant's past overseas trips with prompt returns and his rooted business and family connections in India, concluding that mere notification to the Magistrate would be sufficient. The decision was based on the appellant's conduct and should not set a precedent for future cases. The writ appeals were disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404