https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404 A person facing pending criminal proceedings was permitted to travel abroad without obtaining prior permission in each instance, because the court treated the risk of absconding as minimal on the facts. The allowance was supported by the person's repeated past foreign travel and return without default, and by the fact that the criminal case had reached the charge-sheet stage with further proceedings yet to commence. The court required only prior intimation to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, with travel particulars before departure, and expressly stated that the direction was fact-specific and not a precedent. en-us Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404 A person facing pending criminal proceedings was permitted to travel abroad without obtaining prior permission in each instance, because the court treated the risk of absconding as minimal on the facts. The allowance was supported by the person's repeated past foreign travel and return without default, and by the fact that the criminal case had reached the charge-sheet stage with further proceedings yet to commence. The court required only prior intimation to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, with travel particulars before departure, and expressly stated that the direction was fact-specific and not a precedent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303404