2018 (9) TMI 2084
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Advocates For Respondent : P.S. Dani, Sr. Adv. i/b Manjiri S. Parasnis, Advocate, Rajiv Chavan, Sr. Adv., Priyanka Chavan, Anupama Pawar, Neelam Khaintura i/b C.N. Chavan and Sayali Bhaidkar, Advocates ORDER 1. The above writ petition has been filed for direction to be issued to the respondent No. 2 - Federation to withdraw and/or recall Show Cause Notice dated 12th September, 2016 issue....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ove writ petition in this Court on the ground of jurisdiction. The Learned Senior Counsel would place reliance on Clause 21 of the Constitution and Bye-Laws of the respondent No. 2. The said Clause reads thus:- "21. Legal Course (i) The Federation shall sue and or be sued only in the name of the Hon. Secretary of the Federation, (ii) Any Suits/Legal actions against the F....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al jurisdiction to entertain the above writ petition. 4. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, however, would seek to place reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2014) 9 S.C.C. 329 in the matter of (Nawal Kishore Sharma Vs. Union of India and others), and especially paragraphs 14 and 15 thereof. We have gone through the said judgment of the Apex Court. In ....
TaxTMI