<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 2084 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the jurisdictional challenge raised by the respondent, ruling that the writ petition was not maintainable in Bombay High Court due to the specific clause in the Federation&#039;s Bye-Laws. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter in the courts at Chennai as per the legal provisions, while leaving the merits of the challenge open to be argued in the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=683092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 2084 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the jurisdictional challenge raised by the respondent, ruling that the writ petition was not maintainable in Bombay High Court due to the specific clause in the Federation&#039;s Bye-Laws. The Court directed the petitioner to pursue the matter in the courts at Chennai as per the legal provisions, while leaving the merits of the challenge open to be argued in the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>