https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951 A writ petition challenging a federation's notice, resolutions, disaffiliation and refusal to reaffiliate was held not entertainable in the Bombay High Court because the governing bye-law confined suits and legal actions against the federation to Chennai, or the place where its secretariat was functioning. On that basis, territorial jurisdiction was treated as contractually excluded for courts other than those at Chennai. The Supreme Court authority relied on by the petitioner was found inapplicable on the facts, and the reliefs against other respondents were regarded as incidental to the principal challenge against the federation. The petitioner was directed to pursue relief before the courts at Chennai. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2022 09:18:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951 A writ petition challenging a federation's notice, resolutions, disaffiliation and refusal to reaffiliate was held not entertainable in the Bombay High Court because the governing bye-law confined suits and legal actions against the federation to Chennai, or the place where its secretariat was functioning. On that basis, territorial jurisdiction was treated as contractually excluded for courts other than those at Chennai. The Supreme Court authority relied on by the petitioner was found inapplicable on the facts, and the reliefs against other respondents were regarded as incidental to the principal challenge against the federation. The petitioner was directed to pursue relief before the courts at Chennai. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302951