Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (5) TMI 984

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri T.R. Srinivasan, Consultant for the Appellant Shri R. Rajaraman, AC (AR) for the Respondent ORDER Brief facts are that during the audit of accounts, it was noticed that the assessee is liable to pay service tax under the category of renting of immovable property service, ocean freight charges and scientific and technical services. The appellant paid the tax along with applicable ces....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....imitation. In the previous round of litigation, the Commissioner (Appeals) had already held that the cess paid along with the tax is not eligible for refund. In the second round of litigation, thus, the refund claim was limited to Rs.3,66,307/-. Against this order of the adjudicating authority rejecting the refund claim on the ground of limitation under sec. 11B(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944 r/w ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner vide Final Order No. 50165/2022 dated 11.2.2022 and the case of Punjab National Bank Vs. Commissioner vide Final Order No. 20505/2021 dated 7.7.2021. It is argued by the learned consultant that section 142(8)(b) has an overriding effect and the refund can be rejected only on the ground of unjust enrichment. He prayed that the appeal may be allowed. 4. The lear....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed under the provisions of existing law other than the provisions of subsection 2 of Section 11B (unjust enrichment) of Central Excise Act. 5. Further, again 142(8)(b) also similarly provides for disbursement of any refund arising pursuant to assessment or adjudication proceedings, except for the provisions of Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act, which deals with unjust enrichment. ....