<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 984 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the adjudicating authority to disburse the refund amount along with interest within a specified timeframe. The rejection of the refund claim based on limitation was deemed unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief in their eligibility for service tax refund under the reverse charge mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 984 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the adjudicating authority to disburse the refund amount along with interest within a specified timeframe. The rejection of the refund claim based on limitation was deemed unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant relief in their eligibility for service tax refund under the reverse charge mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>