Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1997 (12) TMI 668

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3 M/s Sona Builders vs. Union of India; and (3) Writ Petition No. 1093/94 M/s Sona Builders vs. Union of India. Three Special Appeals which have come up for hearing, are (1) DB Civil Special Appeal No. 320/94 - M/s Sona Builders vs. Union of India arising out of Writ No. 4667/93; (2) Special Appeal No. 585/96 - Rajendra Giriraj Prasad Tiwari vs. Union of India arising out of Writ Petition No. 3492/93 and (3) Special Appeal No. 377/94 - M/s Sona Builders vs. Union of India arising out of Writ Petition No. 1093/94. They are being disposed of by a common order as identical facts and similar questions of law are involved. 2. Writ Petition No. 3492/93 was filed by the vendor Rajendra Giriraj Prasad Tiwari for quashing of the show cause not....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the plot No. D-34, Bani Park, Jaipur by virtue of a registered will dt. 7th July, 1970 duly executed and registered by his father. The appellant had agreed to sell the said immovable property measuring 1,141.25 sq. yds. or 955 sq. mtrs. to M/s Sona Builders for construction of multi-storied building for consideration of Rs. 28,50,000. The purchaser had paid Rs. 9,50,000 as part of the sale consideration. The appellant and all the partners of M/s Sona Builders, Jaipur had submitted the statement of transfer of the immovable property in prescribed Form No. 37-I as provided in r. 48L of the IT Rules, 1962 before the Appropriate Authority under s. 269UC of the IT Act, 1961 on 9th March, 1993 along with the application for condonation of d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... It was also stated that the right of the pre-emptive purchase shall not be exercised in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. The appellant (petitioner) challenged the validity and legality of the action of the respondents for issuing show cause notice dt. 21st May, 1993 and for passing the order dt. 31st May, 1993 under s. 269UD(1) of the 1961 Act, for purchasing the said immovable property in question by Central Government at an amount equal to the amount of the said consideration. The vendees M/s Sona Builders made similar prayer in its Writ Petition No. 4667/93. 3. Heard counsel for the parties at length. 4. The agreement dt. 11th March, 1992 was neither produced at the time of hearing nor was referred in the agr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of law. In appeal, nothing new has been pointed out and only the points decided by the learned single judge have been reiterated. We do not find anything special to differ from the view expressed by the learned single judge. 7. The learned counsel for the appellant has referred to a decision reported in Fedco Pvt. Ltd. vs. Bilgrami AIR 1960 (SC) 415, wherein it was found that even the cancellation of a licence obtained by fraud required that reasonable opportunity to licencee may be given. There is no dispute with the settled principle that no order could be passed without an opportunity of hearing, but the fate of each case depends upon its own facts and in the instant case we are satisfied that full opportunity was given to the vend....