<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301220</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued under s. 269UD(1) of the IT Act, 1961 regarding the transfer of immovable property, dismissing three writ petitions challenging the notice based on valuation discrepancies. It rejected the claim of denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing, emphasizing the importance of proper document submission. The court upheld the Appropriate Authority&#039;s valuation of the property, highlighting the limitations on examining factual questions under Article 226 and the application of settled legal principles on valuation and market value. All three special appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 14:44:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=673418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301220</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the show cause notice issued under s. 269UD(1) of the IT Act, 1961 regarding the transfer of immovable property, dismissing three writ petitions challenging the notice based on valuation discrepancies. It rejected the claim of denial of a reasonable opportunity of hearing, emphasizing the importance of proper document submission. The court upheld the Appropriate Authority&#039;s valuation of the property, highlighting the limitations on examining factual questions under Article 226 and the application of settled legal principles on valuation and market value. All three special appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>