TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (1) TMI 620
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ull and void; 2. For a Declaration that the resolutions passed at the Board Meetings/General Meetings which have been manipulated by the respondents with respect to shareholding/directorship/vesting themselves with authority as illegal null and void and not binding on the 1st respondent company; 3. For a declaration that the alleged amendment to the Articles of Association as illegal, null and void and not binding on the 1st respondent company; 4. For a declaration that the third Respondent is unfit to continue as Director of the first Respondent Company on account of the gross breach of fiduciary duty by the third respondent and the various manipulations and fraudulent actins initiated by him; 5. For a declaration that form 32 date....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 4. For a declaration that the third Respondent is unfit to continue as Director of the first Respondent Company on account of the gross breach of fiduciary duty by the third respondent and the various manipulations and fraudulent actions initiated by him; 5. For a declaration that form 32 dated 01.10.2007, 21.02.2008 and 04.03.2008 before the Registrar of Companies, Hyderabad reflecting the appointment of Respondents second, four to nine as Directors as illegal, null and void; 6. Consequently for a permanent injunction restraining respondent 2 to 9 from functioning or acting as directors of the first respondent company or holding themselves out as directors of the first respondent company; 7. For declaring the manipulation in the s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t company or holding themselves our as directors of the first respondent company; 6) For declaration the manipulation in the shareholding of the first respondent as shown in the Annexure as illegal, null and void and further declaring the transfer of share shown in the Annexure as null and void; 7) For a declaration that form 18 dated 22.02.2008 filed by the respondent second and the third Respondent showing the shifting of the Registered Office from Sanghinagar to the corporate office at Hyderabad is illegal, null and void. Prayer in CP No. 34/2008 in TP No. 26/HDB/2016 is as follows: 1. "Declaration that the alleged removal/resignation of the 1st petitioner on 31.03.2001 from the board of the 1st respondent as illegal, null and voi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... from Sanghinagar to the Corporate office at Hyderabad is illegal, null and void;" Prayer in CP No. 75/2008 in TP No. 32/HDB/2016 is as follows: I. "For a declaration that the first and second respondents are guilty of gross breach of fiduciary duty as directors and have acted against the interest of the first respondent company and consequently restraining them permanently from functioning as directors of the first respondent company; II. For a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from transferring/dealing with or alienating their shares held in the first respondent company pursuant to the family arrangement/settlement duly recorded in the MOU dated 23.06.2007 and also pursuant to the proceedings before this Hon'ble Bo....