<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 620 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417155</link>
    <description>Family disputes affecting the working of an established company were considered suitable for mediation under section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, where the parties, through counsel and on consent, expressed willingness to explore settlement. The matter was therefore referred to the International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad, to facilitate an amicable resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 08:55:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 620 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417155</link>
      <description>Family disputes affecting the working of an established company were considered suitable for mediation under section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, where the parties, through counsel and on consent, expressed willingness to explore settlement. The matter was therefore referred to the International Arbitration and Mediation Centre, Hyderabad, to facilitate an amicable resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>