TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (1) TMI 524
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....venue Intelligence do not have jurisdiction to issue show-cause notice and secondly, that the show-cause notice proceedings have lingered on for unduly long time and therefore any further continuation is opposed to the provisions of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962. Learned counsel for the petitioner drew our attention to the documents and pleadings on record and pointed out that the question of lack of jurisdiction of the Director of Revenue Intelligence is concluded by the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Canon India Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs (AIR 2021 SC 1699). He submitted that this decision of Supreme Court has been followed by several High Courts and show-cause notices issued by the DRI authorities have been set aside. Learned counsel for the petitioner had placed reliance on the decision of Division Bench of Gujarat High Court in the case of Siddhi Vinayak Syntex Private Limited (2017 (352) E.L.T. 455 (Guj.)) which has been followed by different other High Courts in which on the ground of gross delay in disposal of the proceedings which was unexplained, the proceedings were quashed. With respect to the delay in concluding the show-ca....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as been so entrusted with the functions of a proper officer under Section 28 of the Customs Act, Shri Sanjay Jain, learned Additional Solicitor General relied on a Notification No.40/2012 dated 2.5.2012 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The notification confers various functions referred to in Column (3) of the notification under the Customs Act on officers referred to in Column (2). The relevant part of the notification reads as follows:- "[To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii)] Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification No.40/2012-Customs (N.T.) New Delhi, dated the 2nd May, 2012 S.O. (E). - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (34) of section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs, hereby assigns the officers and above the rank of officers mentioned in Column (2) of the Table below, the functions as the proper officers in relation to the various sections of the Customs Act, 1962, given in the corresponding entry in Column (3) of the said Table: - Sl. No. Designation of the officers Fu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ficers of Central Government should be entrusted with functions of the Customs officers, it was imperative that the Central Government should have done so in exercise of its power under Section 6 of the Act. The reason why such a power is conferred on the Central Government is obvious and that is because the Central Government is the authority which appoints both the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence which is set up under the Notification dated 04.12.1957 issued by the Ministry of Finance and Customs officers who, till 11.5.2002, were appointed by the Central Government. The notification which purports to entrust functions as proper officer under the Customs Act has been issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs in exercise of non-existing power under Section 2 (34) of the Customs Act. The notification is obviously invalid having been issued by an authority which had no power to do so in purported exercise of powers under a section which does not confer any such power. 22. In the above context, it would be useful to refer to the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali and Another5 wherein the proper officer in r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....39;six months', the words 'five years' were substituted." 18. It is plain from the provision that the 'proper officer' being subjectively satisfied on the basis of the material that may be with him that customs duty has not been levied or short levied or erroneously refunded on an import made by any individual for his personal use or by the Government or by any educational, research or charitable institution or hospital, within one year and in all other cases within six months from the relevant date, may cause service of notice on the person chargeable, requiring him to show cause why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice. It is evident that the notice under the said provision has to be issued by the 'proper officer'. 19. Section 2(34) of the Act defines a 'proper officer', thus: '2. Definitions.- (34) 'proper officer', in relation to any functions to be performed under this Act, means the officer of customs who is assigned those functions by the Board or the Commissioner of Customs;' It is clear from a mere look at the provision that only such officers of customs who have been as....