<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 524 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417059</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the show-cause notice issued by the Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked legal authority under the Customs Act, leading to its invalidation. The Rajasthan High Court set aside the notice, emphasizing that the delay in proceedings was unnecessary to address given the jurisdictional defect. Consequently, the petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and any related guarantees and deposits were discharged and deemed refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=667124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 524 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417059</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the show-cause notice issued by the Director of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked legal authority under the Customs Act, leading to its invalidation. The Rajasthan High Court set aside the notice, emphasizing that the delay in proceedings was unnecessary to address given the jurisdictional defect. Consequently, the petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and any related guarantees and deposits were discharged and deemed refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>