2022 (1) TMI 469

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r.Pramod Kumar Chopda Senior Standing Counsel. ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a declaration to declare the petitioner is not liable to pay Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles imported by the petitioner under Bill of Entry Nos.7842486 & 7842661 both dated 29.12.2014. 2. The case of the petitioner is that prior to the issue of the impugned Notification No.48 /2014 da....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sneh Enterprises v. Commr. of Customs, (2006) 7 SCC 714, it is not part of the common law that the import of the goods would be deemed to have been completed only when import goods passes the customers barriers. It is submitted that unless a statutory interdict exist, common law principle would apply which would mean that import would be complete when the goods enter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by an order dated 12.12.2014. 6. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent further submits that the petitioner has not challenged the above said order of this Court rendered in W.P.No.15751 of 2014. It is therefore submitted that the writ petition is devoid on merits and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 7. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e or after issuing of the impugned Notification is to be decided by a proper officer by issuing a notice to the petitioner under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 after proper assessment in the Bill of Entries filed by the petitioner. It is for the petitioner to give a reply. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to decide the issue on merits as to whether the petitioner was indeed liable to pay....