https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417004 The Court refrained from directly deciding on the liability to pay Anti-Dumping Duty and directed assessment by an officer to determine the import timing. The maintainability of the writ petition was challenged but the Court proceeded to address the issues. The Court instructed finalization of assessment for the relevant Bill of Entries for the year 2014-15, allowing the petitioner to appeal if dissatisfied. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for assessment and appeal process, without costs imposed. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:59:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417004 The Court refrained from directly deciding on the liability to pay Anti-Dumping Duty and directed assessment by an officer to determine the import timing. The maintainability of the writ petition was challenged but the Court proceeded to address the issues. The Court instructed finalization of assessment for the relevant Bill of Entries for the year 2014-15, allowing the petitioner to appeal if dissatisfied. The writ petition was disposed of with directions for assessment and appeal process, without costs imposed. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 08 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=417004