1973 (9) TMI 113

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Patna High Court whereby the High Court accepted petition under Section 561A of the CrPC filed by the two respondents and quashed the proceedings which were pending against them in the trial court. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant filed a complaint against the two respondents on the allegation that the appellant was running business at Samastipur in Bihar and Calcutta The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g to get the Drang Transport Corporation registered and they would show the name of the appellant as the proprietor thereof. The respondents also agreed to settle the business accounts in the month of December every year. Despite the aforesaid commitment, the respondents failed to render accounts in the month of December 1967. The respondents on being asked to render the accounts stated that the t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ould not give rise to criminal prosecution. The appellant, it was further observed, had a remedy in the Civil Court and he could not be allowed to fight the matter in Criminal Court. In the result, the criminal proceedings against the respondents were quashed. 4. We have heard Mr. Mafteshwari on behalf of the appellant are of the opinion that no case has been made out against the respondents unde....