<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</link>
    <description>A complaint alleging cheating failed because the material did not show dishonest or fraudulent intention when the money was paid, nor any false representation that induced the payment. The later failure to honour the commitment to record the complainant as proprietor or to render accounts was at most a civil breach of contract and did not satisfy the ingredients of cheating. As the allegations, even if accepted as true, did not disclose an offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, quashing of the criminal proceedings was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</link>
      <description>A complaint alleging cheating failed because the material did not show dishonest or fraudulent intention when the money was paid, nor any false representation that induced the payment. The later failure to honour the commitment to record the complainant as proprietor or to render accounts was at most a civil breach of contract and did not satisfy the ingredients of cheating. As the allegations, even if accepted as true, did not disclose an offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, quashing of the criminal proceedings was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>