<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two respondents, advising the appellant to seek civil remedies for a contractual dispute. The Supreme Court upheld the decision, finding no evidence of dishonest intent or deception by the respondents to warrant criminal prosecution under Section 420 IPC. The Court emphasized that a mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating under the criminal law, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 17:10:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=664962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (9) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two respondents, advising the appellant to seek civil remedies for a contractual dispute. The Supreme Court upheld the decision, finding no evidence of dishonest intent or deception by the respondents to warrant criminal prosecution under Section 420 IPC. The Court emphasized that a mere breach of contract does not constitute cheating under the criminal law, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=299630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>