2019 (7) TMI 1873

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Standing counsel ORDER Mr.Nithyaesh Nataraj, learned counsel of M/s.Nithyaesh and Vaibhav (Law Firm) on behalf of writ petitioner and Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Standing counsel on behalf of sole respondent are before this Court. 2. Owing to the trajectory which the hearing has taken today, the entire writ petition now turns on a very narrow compass. With cons....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xamination of the said two individuals can be done on 07.06.2019 at 11.30 a.m. Thereafter, respondent has sent a communication dated 28.06.2019 bearing reference C.No.ACLFS6523P/CC 2(4)/2019-20, stating that the writ petitioner did not respond to the 03.06.2019 communication and did not cross examine the two witnesses on 07.06.2019 and therefore, the request of the writ petitioner for cross examin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld be caused, if the writ petitioner is given an opportunity to cross examine the aforesaid two individuals on a specified date. 8. To be noted, as alluded to supra in the narrative thus far, writ petitioner sought permission to cross examine three individuals, but permission was accorded to cross examine two individuals. On instructions, learned Revenue counsel submits that permission was accord....