https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298224 The Court set aside a communication due to the alleged non-receipt by the writ petitioner, granting an opportunity for cross examination. A new date was fixed for cross examination of two individuals, with the writ petitioner's lawyer designated for the task. The Court clarified that this decision aimed to ensure fairness and did not indicate a stance on the case's merits. The writ petition was disposed with directions to proceed with cross examination, allowing the respondent to reissue communication for other matters post cross examination. No costs were awarded, and related petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2021 08:15:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298224 The Court set aside a communication due to the alleged non-receipt by the writ petitioner, granting an opportunity for cross examination. A new date was fixed for cross examination of two individuals, with the writ petitioner's lawyer designated for the task. The Court clarified that this decision aimed to ensure fairness and did not indicate a stance on the case's merits. The writ petition was disposed with directions to proceed with cross examination, allowing the respondent to reissue communication for other matters post cross examination. No costs were awarded, and related petitions were closed. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 17 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298224