2018 (4) TMI 1888
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....APANI For the Appellant : Mr. V. Giri, Senior Counsel for Mr. E. Sampathkumar For the Respondent : Mr. G. Rajagopalan, Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. N. Ramesh JUDGMENT (HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties for some time. 2. The writ appeal has been filed by the writ petitioner challenging the order passed by the learned Single ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....res which resulted in filing of a criminal case against the bank officials and the appellant. The consequential order of provisional attachment issued by the respondent was challenged in the writ petition. 4. During the course of arguments, it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that the actual loss to the Government is only Rs. 53.5 crores due to the alleged wrongful waiver of interest gra....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t finding authority as well, this court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition that too, challenging the provisional order of attachment. It is further seen that the petitioner's attempt to quash the FIR also failed, as this Court dismissed the said Crl.O.P. by specifically holding that unless the investigation gets completed, this court cannot jump into a conclusion that the petitione....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....any illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge, warranting interference with the same, except to direct the adjudicating authority to expedite the matter and pass order on merits and in accordance with law after hearing both the parties. It is for the adjudicating authority as a fact finding authority to look into the grievance of the appellant with regard to raisin....
TaxTMI