2018 (2) TMI 2047

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h Special Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of provisional attachment dated 13.02.2018. 2.Heard Mr.B.Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Ramesh, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3.According to the petitioner, when the very allegation of loss of revenue to the Government is confined to Rs. 53.50 crores in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erty. 4.On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that after analysing all the facts and circumstances, the impugned order of attachment, that too, a provisional one was passed and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to seek any indulgence from this Court. He further pointed out that though the petitioner has chosen to refer to the counter filed in the C....