2018 (2) TMI 2047

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an For the Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Special Public Prosecutor ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of provisional attachment dated 13.02.2018. 2.Heard Mr.B.Kumar, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Ramesh, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3.According to the petitioner, when the very allegation of loss of revenue to the Go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of attachment made in the subject matter property. 4.On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that after analysing all the facts and circumstances, the impugned order of attachment, that too, a provisional one was passed and therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to seek any indulgence from this Court. He further pointed out that though the petitioner ha....