Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (8) TMI 723

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D.Audikesavalu For the Petitioner : Mr.E.Omprakash, S.C., For Mr.Ilayaraja Perumal For the Respondents : Mr.P.S.Raman, S.C., For M/s. Aparajitha Viswanath for respondent-1, Not ready in Notice - R2, Ms.G.M.Oviya For Mr.Thiyambak J.Kannan for respondents 3 and 5, Mrs.V.Uma Official Assignee Mr.M.Vasantha Kumar Dy. Official Assignee for respondent-6 ORDER HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE The writ peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in this court to which the petitioner herein was not a party, the charge created in respect of a property in favour of the petitioner herein by the corporate debtor was called into question and some observations made by a Single Bench. An appeal has been preferred by the first respondent herein from the relevant order to question the order of the Single Bench, including the said observations. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, 2016 (IBC) is time bound. ... The complexities in this matter and pending litigations before various courts have been major impediment in conducting CIRP. Since the matter is pending before the Division Bench of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras, all the parties shall place this matter before Hon'ble High Court for direction whether this Adjudicating Authority can proceed as per IBC Rule....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....urt to hand-hold the NCLT and guide it through its proceedings. Indeed, the order and the part thereof extracted above betrays the total non-application of mind in that all the parties before the NCLT were not, and could not have been, parties to the proceedings pending before the Division Bench of this Court and, to such extent, the parties before the NCLT, who are not parties to the proceedings ....