<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411145</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the NCLT for attempting to shift responsibility and reminded it to operate within its authority without seeking guidance from the court. The High Court emphasized that the NCLT should decide independently on the matter before it without involving the court. The judgment disposed of the writ petition with these observations and no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 09:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411145</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the NCLT for attempting to shift responsibility and reminded it to operate within its authority without seeking guidance from the court. The High Court emphasized that the NCLT should decide independently on the matter before it without involving the court. The judgment disposed of the writ petition with these observations and no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>