Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2021 (6) TMI 1007

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n For the Respondents : Mr.V.Sundareswaran, Senior Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr.M.A.Mudimannan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner's prayer in this case is misconceived. It seeks a direction for amendment of its shipping bills for the period 06.02.2017 to 02.01.2018 on the erroneous assumption that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....c Data Interface of the Customs Department (EDI), the field requiring the word 'yes or no' for claim of MEIS benefit has been erroneously filled as 'No' instead of 'yes'. Compared as against the intention of the petitioner expressed in the shipping bills, this is clearly a technical inadvertant error. 5. Reliance on Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 (in short 'Act&#....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....counsel for the respondents points out that though the last of the shipping bills is dated 02.01.2018, the representation of the petitioner for grant of MEIS is dated 04.10.2019, one year and 9 months thereafter. According to him, the claim is thus substantially belated. However, as rightly pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this does not appear to have been a ground on which t....