<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (6) TMI 1007 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409111</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit under the MEIS Scheme within eight weeks. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be denied the benefit due to delay, especially in light of previous similar judgments and the clear intention expressed in the shipping bills.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=648138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (6) TMI 1007 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409111</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and allowed the writ petition, directing the respondents to grant the petitioner the benefit under the MEIS Scheme within eight weeks. The court emphasized that the petitioner should not be denied the benefit due to delay, especially in light of previous similar judgments and the clear intention expressed in the shipping bills.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=409111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>