2020 (7) TMI 771
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....OCATE RESPONDENTS: SHRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADVOCATE ORDER Petitioner is a Public Limited Company involved in development of software and providing man power services. 2. Petitioner filed an application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019. The designated Committee of Bangalore South Commissionerate has passed order on 13th March 2020 as per Annexure....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ns and perused the records. 6. The principal contention of Shri. Shivdas is that petitioner has paid tax as per Annexure-F and the same has not been considered. The stand of the Revenue is that the order has been passed based on the available records and there is discrepancy with regard to the opening and closing balance. The resultant position is, the Revenue has demanded a tax of Rs. 36.54 la....
TaxTMI