Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order passed by the designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme should be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration on account of the petitioner's claim that tax payment had not been properly taken into account and that an opportunity of hearing was required.
Analysis: The petitioner asserted that excess tax had already been paid and that the material evidencing such payment had not been considered. The Revenue maintained that the matter was decided on the records available before the Committee and that there was a discrepancy in the opening and closing balances. In view of the dispute regarding consideration of the tax alleged to have been paid and the need for a fair hearing, the Court found it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and remit the matter for fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity of personal hearing.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the designated Committee for issuance of notice, personal hearing, consideration of the material on record, and passing of fresh orders in accordance with law. The petitioner was to be given only one opportunity of hearing.