2014 (4) TMI 1267

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....<br>Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (J) Shri Vinay Ansurkar, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri M.S. Reddy, Dy Commissioner (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal along an application for stay against the impugned order wherein the appeal has been dismissed for non-compliance under the provisions of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. 2.&emsp;The ld. AR appearing on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... - 2009 (238) E.L.T. 796 and P.D. Manjrekar v. CC - 2007 (213) E.L.T. 405 (Tri.-Mumbai), I hold that the appeal against the impugned order is maintainable before this Tribunal. Therefore, the preliminary objection raised by the learned AR is turned down. 5.&emsp;Now I am proceeding to hear the appeal. As the issue involved in the matter is in a narrow compass therefore, the stay and appeal are ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal was dismissed under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Against the said order, the appellant is before me. 7.&emsp;Considered the submissions made by both sides and also perused the records. 8.&emsp;I observed that the learned Commissioner (Appeals)'s order directing the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty, has not been passed on merits therefore, the order is not correct....