<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1267 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295508</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against the penalty imposed on the appellant for aiding the exporter to avail excess drawback claim is maintainable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The order directing the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty was deemed incorrect and lacking merit. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the appeal, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a proper decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 09:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=646207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1267 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295508</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal against the penalty imposed on the appellant for aiding the exporter to avail excess drawback claim is maintainable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The order directing the appellant to pre-deposit 50% of the penalty was deemed incorrect and lacking merit. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the appeal, remanding the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a proper decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>