1995 (1) TMI 416
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....V.B. Saharya, Adv. For Saharya & Co., Adv. and N.S. Bisht, Adv. ORDER 1. This appeal by Special Leave arises from the Judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 21.2.1985 made in L.P.A. No. 26 of 1985 dismissing the appeal in limine as barred by limitation. 2. The respondent filed the Writ Petition which came up before the learned Single Judge claiming alternative site on the ground that his ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....P. it was specifically stated that inspite of giving opportunities to the respondent on 1.12.1981 and 8.3.1982 to produce the record to show that he was the owner as on the date of the Notification, he had not produced the record. In paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent as well as in the grounds it was stated that "it is irrelevant when the respondent purchased the notifie....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... purchases land subsequent to the Notification may be entitled to claim compensation by virtue of sale made in his favour, namely, the right, title and interest the predecessor had but, he cannot be said to be the owner for allotment since the right of ownership would be determined with reference to the date on which Notification under Section 4(1) was published. This was the view of this Court in....
TaxTMI