https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295206 Entitlement to an alternative site under the Government policy was confined to the person who owned the acquired land on the date of publication of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. The policy was construed on that footing, so a purchaser after the notification could not be treated as the owner for allotment purposes, although such purchaser might still pursue compensation through the transferred interest. The respondent was therefore not entitled to an alternative site because he was not the owner on the relevant notification date. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 May 2021 14:03:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295206 Entitlement to an alternative site under the Government policy was confined to the person who owned the acquired land on the date of publication of the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act. The policy was construed on that footing, so a purchaser after the notification could not be treated as the owner for allotment purposes, although such purchaser might still pursue compensation through the transferred interest. The respondent was therefore not entitled to an alternative site because he was not the owner on the relevant notification date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Jan 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295206