2019 (9) TMI 1512
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... -<br>Central Excise<br>THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.THARANI For the Appellant : Mr.D.Sivaraman For the Respondent : Mr.A.Rahul JUDGMENT [T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] We elaborately heard Mr.D.Sivaraman, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr.A.Rahul, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This appeal is filed by the Tami....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is submitted that the circular is not meant for enabling the retired employees to renew their claim of surrendering their earned leave of 15 days in a year during the service i.e., between 2011-2014 and it is applicable only for existing employees. Therefore, it is submitted that the respondent/writ petitioner cannot lay his claim based upon the circular, dated 09.01.2017. 3.The learned counsel....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....owed the writ petition. 4.While doing so, the Writ Court referred to an earlier order in the case of A.Sundararajan Vs., Tamil Nadu State of Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam Limited) [W.P(MD).No.24245 of 2016 etc batch], wherein similar relief sought for has been granted and the writ petitions were allowed and the appellants Transport Corporation was directed to implement the same. Thus in our....
TaxTMI