Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1988 (3) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l was directed to state a case and make reference under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 (for short, "the Act "), on the following question of law framed by this court : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner had no jurisdiction to impose penalty under section 18(1)(c) in view of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h of March, 1977, i.e., after April 1, 1976, were bad in law. The Tribunal, relying on the decision of this court in CIT v. Dhadi Sahu [1976] 105 ITR 56, accepted this contention of the assessee an cancelled the penalties. But the Revenue succeeded in getting the statement of case called for on the question of law indicated above. On behalf of the assessee, reliance was again placed on Dhadi....